PETS
MITL Quant Alpha
Institutional capital deployment architecture
Research interface · regime lens · mandate overlays
Public view is descriptive by design
Research Snapshot Overlay

PETS is a capital deployment architecture — not a stock ranking model.

PETS / MITL Quant Alpha is a vertically integrated ecosystem designed to translate structural compatibility into capacity-aware deployment decisions. It is built for institutionally tradable universes and expresses its research output as strategy-conditioned edge — not universal factor scores.

Structural compatibility Strategy-conditioned edge Extractability Capacity-aware prioritization Regime-aware framework Mandate overlays Capital deployment efficiency Governance & auditability
Positioning discipline
This site is intentionally architecture-first. It avoids performance marketing, operational thresholds, and “signal service” framing.
What the public pages show
Structural compatibility, regime posture, deployment philosophy, and module coherence — described at an institutional level without revealing proprietary mechanics.
What is reserved for credentialed validation
Backtest outputs, portfolio/single-symbol validation views, and audit exports are available via the credentialed validation interface (login required). Public pages continue to withhold thresholds, execution semantics detail, and reconstruction-relevant mechanics.
1 One-paragraph architectural truth
Institutional summary

Deployment architecture built to scale capital — measured by deployment efficiency, not marketing narratives.

A descriptive framework that stays coherent across research, portfolio posture, validation, and mandate overlays.
Architecture · not advice

PETS combines a universal structural layer (Fundamentals, Quality, Growth, Structure, Chaos, Rebound) with a PETS-specific edge layer (historical extractability) to produce strategy-conditioned compatibility. Candidates are not “ranked for everyone” — they are prioritized for deployment fit under liquidity, capacity, and mandate constraints. The architecture emphasizes capital deployment efficiency: how capital is deployed, recycled, and compounded under controlled constraints, while preserving institutional interpretability.

Public content is framed as structure and architecture — not predictions, recommendations, or performance marketing.
2 Architectural stack (ecosystem flow)
Ecosystem

Vertically integrated: conditioning → engine → portfolio construction → deployment → validation → overlays

A coherent stack designed to remain institutionally interpretable at every layer.
Layer 0
Research Conditioning

Universal structural descriptors + PETS edge features shape compatibility. Output is diagnostic: why a candidate fits, not “best stock.”

Layer 1
PETS Signal Engine

Core engine expresses deployment posture and transition states. Signals are an internal language; the public surface stays structural.

Layer 2
Portfolio Construction (Phoenix Capital Compounding™)

Phoenix Capital Compounding™ is the portfolio construction layer that governs how capital is deployed and compounded under the architecture — designed to preserve scalability discipline without disclosing proprietary mechanics.

Layer 3
Capacity-Aware Prioritization

Candidates are prioritized by deployment priority under tradability constraints — not by generic factor rank.

Layer 4
Execution + Validation

Execution and validation exist to preserve accounting integrity and auditability. The credentialed validation interface supports allocator diligence without public parameter disclosure.

Layer 5
Mandate Overlays

Retirement overlay demonstrates the same engine expressed under a different mandate. It is an extension module — not a separate strategy.

The stack is designed so an allocator can interpret “what the system is doing” without requiring public threshold or execution disclosure.
3 Edge (what it means, what it is not)
Edge concept

Strategy-conditioned edge = extractability under specific mechanics.

Compatibility is defined relative to the strategy’s extraction process.

PETS treats “edge” as a conditional property: how a security’s structure behaves under the engine’s extraction rules (path quality, regime behavior, and structural coherence). This avoids the category error of presenting a universal rank as if it transfers across mandates.

Not a factor rank
Not predictive AI
Not advice
Public labels stay diagnostic. Thresholds and reconstruction-relevant mechanics remain private.
Why this isn’t a screener

Universal descriptors + PETS edge → deployment prioritization.

Architecture-first framing that reduces category confusion for allocators.

A screener answers “what looks good?” PETS answers “what is structurally compatible with this engine, in this regime, under capacity discipline?” That difference is the core of the positioning.

Public surface
Structure & posture

Structural compatibility, regime context, and module coherence.

Credentialed validation
Diligence interface

Backtest outputs and exports presented as diligence tooling (login required) — not public marketing.

Private artifacts
Mechanics & thresholds

Parameter thresholds, internal accounting constructs, and reconstruction-relevant execution semantics.

The site preserves scarcity and strategy integrity by design.
4 Ecosystem modules (wired to pages)
Module

Research Intelligence

Compatibility lens

Structural + PETS-specific conditioning that expresses strategy fit and extractability, alongside capacity-aware prioritization cues.

Public-facing · descriptive
Module

Institutional Snapshot

Portfolio posture

Allocator-facing regime context and structural posture view. A portfolio-level lens without performance marketing or operational disclosure.

Public-facing · neutral
Module

Retirement Overlay

Mandate extension

Demonstrates the engine’s adaptability under a different mandate. Not a separate strategy — the same architecture expressed as an overlay module.

Public-facing · structural
Module

Validation Engine

Credentialed interface

Access-controlled validation environment designed for allocator diligence. Portfolio-level views are available via credentialed access. Exports support audit review. (Login required.)

5 Deployment philosophy
Philosophy

Compatibility first. Capacity always. Regime awareness as a constraint.

PETS is designed as capital architecture — evaluated through capital deployment efficiency.

Institutional deployment requires more than “good signals.” It requires a coherent translation between security behavior, regime context, and allocation constraints. PETS is built to keep those translations stable as capital scales, and as mandates vary — with an emphasis on how capital is deployed, recycled, and compounded under discipline.

The public interface focuses on structure (what the system sees) and posture (how it frames deployment conditions) while protecting the private mechanics that create extractability.

Portfolio construction pillar
Phoenix Capital Compounding™

Phoenix Capital Compounding™ is the portfolio construction layer that governs capital compounding behavior under PETS. The public description is intentional; reconstruction-relevant accounting mechanics are reserved for credentialed diligence.

Governance
Determinism & auditability

Rules-based decision layer designed for repeatability and audit review. The validation interface supports diligence artifacts without requiring public disclosure of thresholds or internal mechanics.

The intent is allocator interpretability without revealing proprietary thresholds, execution semantics detail, or reconstruction-relevant mechanics.
6 Universe discipline (institutional tradability)
Universe rules

Curated, institutionally tradable universe — enforced as capacity realism.

Exclusions are not dismissive; they preserve execution integrity and scalability discipline.
Tradability discipline
Included
Institutional universe

Curated universe (~1,450 symbols) designed for institutional tradability: liquidity filters, market-cap discipline, and structural execution viability.

Excluded
Non-scalable profiles

Micro-cap, thin liquidity, unstable histories, and structurally non-tradable profiles are excluded to avoid false conclusions and capacity illusion. Universe discipline is an enforcement of capacity realism — not a stylistic preference.

Universe discipline is part of the architecture — not an afterthought.
7 Institutional contact
Institutional contact (subtle)

For allocator due diligence, licensing discussions, or architecture review.

PETS is presented here as a descriptive framework. Detailed validation artifacts and mechanics are shared privately in allocator context. If you are reviewing the architecture for capital deployment fit, contact is available below.

Preferred channel
quantalpha2025@gmail.com
Email
What to include
Mandate · capital range · liquidity constraints · review scope
Note: This site does not provide investment advice. Public content remains descriptive; credentialed validation is provided for diligence context.